Trisomy Disorders

Triple-marker prenatal screening program for chromosomal defects.

Posted on: September 17, 2009


Triple-marker prenatal screening program for chromosomal defects.

Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Jul

Kazerouni NN, Currier B, Malm L, Riggle S, Hodgkinson C, Smith S, Tempelis C, Lorey F, Davis A, Jelliffe-Pawlowski L, Walton-Haynes L, Roberson M.
Genetic Disease Screening Program, California Department of Public Health, Richmond, California, USA. neely.kazerouni@cdph.ca.gov

OBJECTIVE: To examine screening performance of California’s triple-marker screening program, using data from a statewide registry for chromosomal defects.

METHODS: This study included 752,686 women who received a screening risk and had an expected date of delivery between July 2005 and the end of June 2007. Follow-up diagnostic services for screen-positive women were performed at state-approved centers. Data on diagnostic outcomes from these visits were entered into the California Chromosomal Defect Registry (CCDR). Other CCDR sources include mandatory reporting by all cytogenetic laboratories and hospitals and outcome data forms submitted by prenatal care providers. RESULTS: The observed detection rate for Down syndrome (N=1,217) was 77.4%. It varied significantly by gestational dating method and maternal age. The rates for women aged younger than 35 years and 35 years and older were 62.4% and 94.0%, respectively. The detection rates were 81.3% for ultrasound-dated pregnancies and 67.5% for last menstrual period-dated pregnancies. For Turner syndrome, trisomy 18, triploidy, and trisomy 13, the detection rates were 79.4%, 82.5%, 98.1%, and 36.0%, respectively. The positive rate for Down syndrome was 5.4%. Of women with a Down syndrome fetus who were screen positive, only 49.5% opted for amniocentesis. Of women who obtained results from amniocentesis indicating a Down syndrome fetus, 61.4% had an elective termination, 26.2% had a live birth, 4.5% had a death or miscarriage, and 7.9% had an unknown outcome.

CONCLUSION: The observed performance of this large triple-marker screening program exceeds generally predicted detection rates for Down syndrome. This study methodology will be used to measure the performance of subsequent screening enhancements.

Lippincott, Wilkins & Williams

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

September 2009
M T W T F S S
« Jan   Feb »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930  

Blog Stats

  • 79,223 hits

Top Posts

%d bloggers like this: